Pixabay
Presidential debates have been a key part of American democracy since 1976, offering voters a chance to see candidates in real-time. The moderator’s role is crucial—they keep the discussion on track, ensure each candidate has time to speak, and maintain decorum. But after the recent 2024 election debates, there’s been a growing question: should moderators also be responsible for fact-checking the candidates?
On one hand, debates are meant to be an opportunity for candidates to present their policies, make their case, and persuade voters. However, when misinformation is allowed to go unchecked, it can leave the public confused or misled. In a world where misinformation can spread fast, especially on social media, many argue that moderators should step in when a candidate says something misleading. Fact-checking in real time during a debate could help ensure that voters are getting the truth, as most people won’t take the time to research every claim candidates make. A well-prepared moderator could immediately point out lies, which could push candidates to be more honest.
However, some worry that fact-checking could introduce bias. Who gets to decide what’s true or false? While some facts are clear-cut, others are more open to interpretation. If a moderator favors one candidate, fact-checking could change the debate from being neutral to right or left leaning. This could risk shifting moderators away from their roles as neutral third parties.
There’s also the question of practicality. Real-time fact-checking is difficult. Moderators would need instant access to vast amounts of information and the ability to verify complex statements. The risk of making a mistake is high.
In the end, while having moderators fact-check during debates sounds great in theory, it’s difficult in practice. They already have the tough job of managing time and keeping discussions focused. Adding fact-checking might overcomplicate things. A more feasible option could be for independent fact-checkers to release their findings immediately after the debate, so the public still gets accurate information without putting extra pressure on moderators.
Debates should remain a platform for ideas and civil discourse, not just a fact-checking contest. There needs to be a balance between ensuring honesty and giving candidates the space to make their case.
